Tracking the Storm

Brind'Amour: The Cup

Thursday, 02.17.2011 / 9:47 AM ET / Tracking the Storm
By Paul Branecky
Share with your Friends

Brind\'Amour: The Cup
This is the fourth in a daily five-part series ahead of Rod Brind’Amour Night on Friday, Feb. 18. Check back each morning for the next installment. Standing-room only tickets for Friday’s game are still available.

Also see our daily video countdown of Brind'Amour's Top 5 Moments as a Hurricane.

Of all the memories that remain from the Hurricanes’ 2006 run to the Stanley Cup, it’s easy to forget that it was almost over as soon as it began.

Paul Branecky
Follow on Twitter

After the best regular season in franchise history, the Canes had claimed the Eastern Conference’s No. 2 seed heading into their first-round match-up with the Montreal Canadiens. With home-ice advantage at the RBC Center, where they had already won 31 games, they seemed to be in good position.

Until they weren’t.

Montreal surprisingly took the first two games in Raleigh, including a double-overtime defeat in Game 2, marking the Hurricanes’ first back-to-back home losses since November of that season. The Canes were then faced with the challenge of having to win four of the next five, including two on the road.

Thing seemed even bleaker when the Canes found themselves trailing by a goal with just over eight minutes remaining in Game 3. That was when Rod Brind’Amour scored to tie the game, setting the stage for Eric Staal’s overtime winner and four consecutive victories to close the series.

Five years later, many still see it as Brind’Amour’s biggest goal as a Hurricane.

“We needed a spark and he scored a huge, huge goal to get us to overtime and we kind of got the ball rolling from there,” said Staal. “We felt like we were playing well and kind of got into a groove after that win.”

“If Rod had not scored that, we would have probably been knocked out in the first round,” said General Manager Jim Rutherford. “When things looked a little shaky, he was a key guy as far as saying, ‘Let’s keep going, it’s OK.’”

Brind’Amour, never one to place as much weight on his own accomplishments as others might, doesn’t see that effort as the make-or-break goal of the postseason. That’s not because it wasn’t important, but because of the extreme confidence he felt at the time, regardless of the odds against his team.

“Even if we had lost Game 3, I honestly believe that we would have won four in a row,” he said.

Even though the Hurricanes did win every game of the series after Brind’Amour’s goal, doing so while down 3-0 is something different entirely. At that time, only two teams in NHL history had ever accomplished the feat, the most recent being the 1975 New York Islanders.

Still, seeing Brind’Amour’s conviction as he says it, one can’t help but believe him.

“People on the outside were writing us off, but we knew we were better than them,” he said. “We all felt that way, and that’s what was great. That’s belief, and you have to have that.

“There was this quiet confidence about that team all year. It was like, ‘We are better than you and we know it.’ We weren’t going to brag about it. We were going to show you, and it was going to come out.”

In leading the Hurricanes over Montreal and to two Game 7 victories against Buffalo and Edmonton, Brind’Amour showed plenty. He led the team with 12 goals in the postseason, with a series-clinching third-period tally in the final game with the Sabres another key moment in the Canes’ march to the championship. He would also score the game-winning goal in the team’s next game, as he literally and figuratively stole Game 1 of the finals from Edmonton by stripping the puck from goaltender Ty Conklin behind the net with 32 seconds left in a game they trailed 3-0 at the halfway point.

“It was one of the many times that he scored big goals in the playoffs that year, and that’s the on-ice leadership,” said Staal. “Those are key moments that help you win a championship.”

As confident as Brind’Amour and the Hurricanes were, their biggest test was saved for last. Having once led Edmonton by two games in the finals, they lost two straight with the Stanley Cup on standby, forcing a Game 7 with the momentum seemingly not on their side.

“When you have it right there and you have two chances at it and it’s taken away and taken away, there was more of the fear factor of not accomplishing what was meant to happen,” he said. “The good thing about it at that point was that we knew it was over and that it was this one game and that was it – we had to bring it all that night.”

Fortunately, they were able to do so at home.

“If ever there was a home ice or home field advantage that deserved some credit for winning, you’d have to give it to them,” he said. “They were so involved in every minute and every second. They did not give us a chance to let off the gas.”

Every season, a captain raises the Stanley Cup. It’s the ultimate moment for any hockey player, and their reactions reflect it. That being said, it would take something special for one to stand out among the rest. Even in looking at still photos of Brind’Amour’s unbridled joy as he finished the by-now famous slow stomp of the feet and lifted it for the first time, there’s still nothing quite like it.

He cites several reasons for that, with the fact that he won it on his third trip to the finals at the age of 35, in his 17th season and his 1,328th game, playing no small part. However, a leader to the end, he said that his thoughts at that time went beyond the gesture itself.

“Most of the time when you raise it, it’s about that guy or whatever,” he said. “When I raised it, people look at it and I think they feel like it was their cup and I represented them. It wasn’t ‘I,’ it’s ‘we.’”




1 p - NYR 82 53 22 7 248 187 113
2 y - MTL 82 50 22 10 214 184 110
3 x - TBL 82 50 24 8 259 206 108
4 x - WSH 82 45 26 11 237 199 101
5 x - NYI 82 47 28 7 245 224 101
6 x - DET 82 43 25 14 231 211 100
7 x - OTT 82 43 26 13 232 208 99
8 x - PIT 82 43 27 12 217 204 98
9 BOS 82 41 27 14 209 201 96
10 FLA 82 38 29 15 198 213 91
11 CBJ 82 42 35 5 227 248 89
12 PHI 82 33 31 18 212 223 84
13 NJD 82 32 36 14 176 209 78
14 CAR 82 30 41 11 183 219 71
15 TOR 82 30 44 8 206 257 68
16 BUF 82 23 51 8 153 269 54


E. Staal 77 23 31 -13 54
J. Faulk 82 15 34 -19 49
E. Lindholm 81 17 22 -23 39
V. Rask 80 11 22 -14 33
J. Skinner 77 18 13 -24 31
N. Gerbe 78 10 18 -14 28
R. Nash 68 8 17 -10 25
J. Staal 46 6 18 -6 24
J. Liles 57 2 20 -9 22
J. McClement 82 7 14 -7 21
C. Ward 22 24 5 .910 2.40
A. Khudobin 8 17 6 .900 2.72